Selective enforcement?

Our Government system should not pick winners and losers, but should treat everyone with the same basic rules.

If we are going to enforce the CDD efforts to recoup the costs of this lawsuit, then we MUST enforce that on past lawsuits, also whenever in the future and past the CDD is/was forced to defend their board members or affiliates.

So if you want us to go after the current lawsuit persons, and this board chooses to do so,  then we must enforce the same on the past persons or entities who went after past boards or caused the board or its affiliates to settle in any way shape or form in the past,  because no one should tolerate selectively enforcing the law.

In law, selective enforcement occurs when government officials  exercise enforcement discretion, which is the power to choose whether or how to punish a person or entities. The biased use of enforcement discretion, such as that based on racial, personal, prejudice or corruption, is usually considered a legal abuse and a threat to the rule of law.

The Government should and is obligated to treat everyone the same, and it will be very hard for a government agency to justify such a move to do otherwise.

Besides:  it may not even be financially advantageous, and just a waste of time, effort and more money…plus, keep in mind while we do this we cannot get a bond.

It is time to move on and get Mira Bay out of litigation as its main topic.

As the old saying goes,

“Be careful what you wish for”